近十年全球癌痛研究热点与演进趋势的文献计量学分析*
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.北京大学基础医学院病理学系;2.北京大学第三医院病理科;3.首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院检验科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院2025提升计划C类(CYTS2025C25)


Bibliometric Analysis of Global Cancer Pain Hotspots and Evolving Trends Over a Decade
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University Health Science Center;2.Department of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    运用文献计量学分析2016至2025年全球癌痛领域的研究现状与演进趋势,为基础机制研究与临床干预策略优化提供客观参考。方法:以Web of Science核心合集为数据源,筛选并纳入癌痛相关原创研究与综述共2823篇。采用VOSviewer与CiteSpace软件,对发文趋势、国家/机构合作网络、高被引文献以及关键词的共现与突现特征进行可视化定量分析。结果:2019年后领域年均发文量稳定于300篇左右。中国总发文量(824篇)居首,而美国在总被引频次(15616次)及国际合作网络中占据绝对主导地位。高被引文献多聚焦于流行病学基线与权威指南共识。关键词共现析出癌性骨痛机制、临床管理障碍、阿片类药物安全性、姑息治疗及生活质量评价五大核心方向。演进脉络显示,近期研究焦点已由早期的宏观量化评估转向难治性癌痛攻坚,“中医药”成为2023—2025年间核心突现词。结论:近十年癌痛研究的重心正向微观神经互作机制探讨与多模式综合干预纵深发展。我国在此领域虽具规模优势但高级别循证证据相对匮乏;中西医结合镇痛已展现出显著转化潜力,未来需依托高质量多中心临床研究以弥合指南与实践的鸿沟。

    Abstract:

    To investigate the global research landscape and emerging trends in cancer pain from 2016 to 2025 using a bibliometric approach, providing insights for mechanistic studies and clinical management. Methods: A total of 2,823 original articles and reviews were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were utilized to visualize publication trends, national and institutional collaborations, highly cited papers, as well as keyword co-occurrence and bursts. Results: Annual publication volume has stabilized at approximately 300 papers since 2019. While China led in total publication output (n=824n = 824n=824), the United States remained the most influential regarding total citations (15,616) and central collaborative roles. Highly cited studies primarily addressed epidemiology and clinical guidelines. Keyword network analysis identified five major domains: bone cancer pain mechanisms, clinical management barriers, opioid safety, palliative care, and quality-of-life assessment. Temporal analysis revealed a paradigm shift from broad symptom evaluation to the targeted management of refractory pain, with "traditional Chinese medicine" emerging as the strongest keyword burst between 2023 and 2025. Conclusion: Cancer pain research is increasingly focusing on neurobiological mechanisms and multimodal interventions. Although China contributes significantly to the global publication volume, high-quality, evidence-based studies are still warranted. Integrative medicine demonstrates considerable translational potential, highlighting the need for robust multicenter clinical trials to bridge the current evidence-to-practice gap.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-02
  • 最后修改日期:2026-04-28
  • 录用日期:2026-06-22
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码