新冠疫情期间缓和医学线下教学前后电子问卷调查报告

Electronic questionnaire report of pre- and post palliative medicine teaching during the COVID-19 period

摘要:

目的：比较新冠疫情期间《缓和医学》线下授课前后研究生对相关知识的理解、评价授课效果。方法：采用电子问卷调查，比较授课前后对线上和线下教学、缓和医学基本知识的理解。结果：课前183人、课后181人参加了调查，基本情况无显著差异；课前65.03%、课后74.59%的研究生认为线上授课对学习有一定影响，但并不显著，二者相比无显著性差异（p=0.05）；课前与课后相比，对缓和医学的重要性、安宁疗护和症状管理的看法及基本镇痛知识都有显著提升（p<0.05）；但在缓和医疗与安宁疗护概念上仍有混淆；对基本伦理学原则、疾病末期患者的治疗原则掌握较好。结论：线上教学对学习效果可能有一些影响，但也是一种灵活有效的教学方式；缓和医学教学是有成效的，今后的教学重点要集中在伦理学原则、缓和医学和安宁疗护的联系和区别及基本镇痛知识上。

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the basic knowledge of palliative care pre- and post the teaching of palliative medicine and to evaluate the teaching effect during the COVID-19 period. Methods: Electronic questionnaire was used to compare the understanding of online and offline teaching and the basic palliative care knowledge. Results: 183 and 181 postgraduate students attended the survey before and after the teaching, and there were no significant difference in their basic situation. 65.03% and 74.59% of students thought online teaching affected their learning, but not significant (p=0.05); the understanding of the importance of palliative medicine, palliative care, symptom management and basic pain relief were significantly improved after teaching (p<0.05); But there is still confusion on the concept of palliative and hospice care. A good grasp of basic principles on ethical and terminal care were achieved after teaching. Conclusion: Online teaching may affect the learning effect, but it’s also a flexible and effective learning method; our teaching of palliative medicine is very effective；Future teaching should focus on ethical principles, connection and differences between palliative and hospice care and basic analgesic knowledge.