高场强脉冲射频治疗糖尿病合并带状疱疹后神经痛*
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.厦门医学院附属第二医院疼痛科;2.福建省立医院疼痛科;3.厦门医学院附属第二医院质控科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

厦门市科技计划项目(3502Z20154066)


Effects of high-field pulsed radio frequency on postherpetic neuralgia with diabetes
Author:
Affiliation:

1.The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical College;2.Fujian Provincial Hospital, Provincial Clinic College of Fujian Medical University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:回顾性分析高场强脉冲射频治疗糖尿病合并带状疱疹后神经痛(postherpetic neuralgia, PHN)的临床效果。 方法: 统计2017年6月至2019年6月期间83例PHN经高场强脉冲射频治疗患者,分为糖尿病组(34例)与无糖尿病组(49例),对其治疗前后NRS( numeric rating scale, NRS)分值(治疗后1周,1月,3月,6月)、治疗后用药情况及睡眠质量评分(quality of sleep,QS)进行回顾性分析。 结果:治疗后随访6月,,共83例完成随访,两组患者高场强脉冲射频治疗前后NRS评分差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);与无糖尿病组比较,糖尿病组患者NRS评分在治疗后1周、1月、3月及6月均要较高(P <0.05);治疗后6月时,与无糖尿病组比较,糖尿病组的曲马多使用率较高,两组患者治疗后1周、1月、3月曲马多使用率及治疗后1周、1月、3月及6月加巴喷丁使用率无统计学意义;与无糖尿病组相比,糖尿病组在治疗后6月时的睡眠质量改善明显较差(P <0.05)。 结论:高场强脉冲射频治疗对糖尿病合并PHN患者治疗有效,但效果不如无糖尿病的PHN患者。

    Abstract:

    Objective A retrospective analysis of the clinical effects of high-field pulsed radiofrequency in treating diabetes complicated with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Methods 83 patients with postherpetic neuralgia, from June 2017 to June 2019, were divided into two groups: diabetic group and non-diabetic group. Patients were received high-field pulsed radiofrequency combined drug therapy.The numeric rating scale (NRS) , postoperative medication and the quality of sleep(QS)were calculated at pre-treatment, and 1week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months of post-treatment in all patients. Results Compared with pre-treatment,the scores of NRS were signi?cantly decreased in both groups (P< 0.05). Follow-up for 6 months, 1 case was lost to follow-up, 83 cases completed follow-up. The improvement of NRS in the diabetic group at 1week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery was significantly lower than that of the non-diabetic group (P< 0.05). Compared with the non-diabetic group, the usage rate of medicine was no significantly different from the diabetic group decreased 6 months of post-treatment (P>0.05). The quality of sleep was significantly lower in the non-diabetic group than that in the diabetic group at 6 months after the treatment (P<0.05). Conclusion High-field pulsed radiofrequency treatment is effective for patients with diabetes and PHN, but the effect is not as good as for patients with PHN alone.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-26
  • 最后修改日期:2020-12-25
  • 录用日期:2021-01-31
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码