不同压强体外冲击波治疗肱骨外上髁炎的临床研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

山东省菏泽市立医院疼痛科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Clinical study on the treatment of lateral epicondylitis with different pressure extracorporeal shock waves
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Pain Medicine,Heze Municipal Hospital,Heze,274000;2.China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨不同压强体外冲击波治疗肱骨外上髁炎的临床疗效。方法:选择2017年3至2018月3月在菏泽市立医院疼痛科门诊就诊的肱骨外上髁炎患者90例纳入研究,根据治疗压强不同分为Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组、Ⅲ组,每组30例,压强分别为1bar、2bar、3bar。三组均每周治疗1次,连续治疗5次为一疗程。比较治疗前、末次治疗后1个月、3个月、6个月NRS疼痛评分和治疗相关的不良反应。结果:三组组内治疗后不同时点NRS评分均低于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组治疗后6个月NRS评分低于Ⅰ组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组治疗后6个月NRS评分相比无明显变化,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组治疗后6个月优良率大于Ⅰ组(P<0.05);Ⅲ组不良反应治疗后疼痛多于Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:压强2bar和3bar治疗组疗效优于压强1bar治疗组,压强为3bar治疗组治疗后反应性疼痛发生率高。压强为2bar的体外冲击波治疗肱骨外上髁炎的疗效佳且不良反应少。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of different pressure extracorporeal shock waves in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Method: A total of 90 patients with Lateral epicondylitis who were admitted to the Pain Department of Heze Municipal Hospital from March 2017 to March 2018 were enrolled. According to the difference of treatment pressure,the patients were divided into three groups: Group I, Group II, and Group III ,and each group include 30 cases. The corresponding pressure is 1bar, 2bar, 3 bar, individually. All three groups were treated once a week, and 5 consecutive treatments made a course of a treatment.NRS pain scores and treatment-related adverse events were compared before treatment, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the last treatment. Results: The NRS scores at different time points after treatment in the three groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (p<0.05). After 6 months of treatment, the NRS scores in Group II and III were significantly lower than those in Group I (p<0.05);however, there was no significant difference in NRS scores between Group II and Group III (p>0.05); the excellent rate of Group II and Group III was greater than in Group I (p<0.05); patients from Group III suffered more pain after treatment than Group I and Group II (p<0.05). Conclusion: The effective rate of treatment in 2 bar and 3 bar pressure was higher than in 1 bar pressure. The incidence of reactive pain was higher in the 3 bar treatment group. The extracorporeal shock wave with a pressure of 2 bar is relatively effective in treating Lateral epicondylitis with less adverse reactions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-24
  • 最后修改日期:2019-05-15
  • 录用日期:2019-06-06
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码