颈中交感神经节阻滞方法和并发症预防
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R614

基金项目:


METHOD OF MIDDLE CERVICAL GANGLION BLOCK AND PREVENTION OF COMPLICATIONS
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为比较颈中神经节和星状神经节的阻滞效果和并发症,将23个病例随机分为颈中节组,共阻滞100例次,和星状节组,共阻滞80例次。阻滞药液均为1%利多卡因10ml(含维生素B120.5mg、当归液1~2ml或/和地塞米松2.5~5mg)。颈中节组采取气管旁颈6横突法,星状节组采取气管旁颈7横突法。两组均以出现霍纳氏综合征为阻滞成功的标准。结果;颈中节组成功率为98%,星状节组为91.2%,差异性非常显著(P<0.01),前者声嘶、咽部不适发生率明显低于后者(P<0.05)。我们认为颈中神经节阻滞同样能获得良好效果,迅速出现霍纳氏综合征,其方法比星状神经节阻滞更简便、安全、可靠,故对头面部疾患,可选用颈中神经节阻滞。但操作亦应谨慎,以防止发生并发症。

    Abstract:

    The aim of this study was to compere the effect and complications of middle cervi cal ganglion block(MCGB)with that of stellate ganglion block(SGB).23 cases were ran domly distributed to MCGB group(100 injections)and SGB group(80 injections).10ml of 1% lidocaine(containing 0.5mg of VB12,1-2 ml of Denggui solution and/or 2.5-5mgdexamethasone)was injected.Injections were made near the transverse process of C6 and C7spine for GCMB and SGB,respectively.The appearance of Horner's syndrome was em ployed as the standard of success.Result:The success rates in MCGB group were 98%,wnich was significantly higher than SGB group(91.2%,PM 0.01),while the occurrencerate of hoarseness and pharynx discomfort was significantly lower(P<0.05).ConClusion:Since MCGB lead to the same good effects as SGB with a rapid Horner's syndrome displayand Simpler,safer,more relisble operation,we suggest to use MCGB in face and bed disor ders,when applicable.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王其豪,陈敏光,陈孔利.颈中交感神经节阻滞方法和并发症预防[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,1996,2(4):

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码