两种动态变化电流对人体痛阈的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R338.3 R338.8

基金项目:


INFLUENCE OF COMPUTERIZED MEDIUM FREQUENCY CURRENT AND DYNAMIC INTERFERENCE CURRENT ON PAIN THRESHOLD OF HUMANS
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    本文对比动脉干扰电流和电脑中频电流对人体痛阈的影响。30名受试者分为对照组,动脉干扰电组和电脑中频电阻(每组10例),作用部位为腰部,观察作用前及作用后即刻,作用后15分钟时局部痛阈的变化。结果,作用后即刻和作用后15分钟两组电流的痛阈均显著升高,与对照组比较差异非常显著(P〈0.01)。作者后15分钟,电脑中频电组的痛阈升高值显著高于动态干扰电组(P〈0.05),提示电脑中频电流的镇痛后效应优于

    Abstract:

    The purpose of this study was to compere the effects of computerized mediumfrequency current(CMFC)and dynamic interference current(DIC)on pain threshold. Thirty cases were randomly divided into 3 groups:control group,CMFC group and DIC group(10 persons in each group). Pain threshold increased significantly(P<0.01)in the CMFC group and DIC group following treatment.The pain threshold in the CMFC group increasedmore significantly than that in the DIC group 15 minutes after treatment(P<0.05).Thecontrol group demonstrated no statistically significant change in pain threshold.The resultssuggest that computerized medium frequency current is more effective in increasing pain threshold than dynamic interence current.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张鸣生 厉以君.两种动态变化电流对人体痛阈的影响[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,1996,2(3):166~168

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码